iai plus banner

channels

Philosophy for our times: cutting edge debates and talks from the world's leading thinkers

Can Animals Be Moral?

to get free unlimited access to all videos on iai tv and all articles on iai news, as well as advance notice of the events.
You can watch up to an hour of video per month and 20 mins of any one video without signing up.
You have watched half an hour of our debates and talks on iai tv. To watch more than an hour of video per month or more than 20 mins of any one video you need to join iai+. Joining iai+ is free and gives you free unlimited access to iai tv and iai news.
You have watched your maximum monthly limit of videos. Join iai+ to view an unlimited number of videos on iai tv and articles on iai news. Joining iai+ is free and only takes a minute.

Mark Rowlands.

Philosophers have said almost universally that animals cannot be moral. Mark Rowlands, author of the internationally bestselling memoir The Philosopher and the Wolf makes the case for the defence.

"Remarkable" Financial Times

Being Conscious
Steve Fuller, Hilary Lawson, Iain McGilchrist, Roger Penrose
Six Billion Characters in Search of an Author
Jez Butterworth, Gabriel Gbadamosi, Tim McInerny, Richard Schoch
Join the conversation

to post comments or join now (only takes a moment). Don't have an account? Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or Google to get started:

David Silverman on 30/08/2013 11:28pm

I'm not sure about this alleged regress problem. Kantians think that to be moral you must be able to modulate your behaviour by reflecting on it rationally. This requires the ability to use concepts, a capacity which non-human animals, as far as we know, lack. There doesn't need to be any further account to show that you can control your patterns of rational thought; it is enough that your behaviour is motivated by the relevant moral concepts in the first place. Mark is right that it seems silly to deny that animals possess sympathy or "morality" in some weaker sense; but this is not at all the same thing as human morality. Instead of casting it as a binary choice between deflating human morality and underrating the capacities of animals, wouldn't it be better just to acknowledge that each species has its own distinctive capacities?

Copy and paste the code below to embed or link to this video.

Embed:
Embed options
Link:
  • Video Seek
    Converted to a link which jumps to that point in the video
    Example: 00:34
  • Bold Text
    Example: [b]Bold[/b]
  • Italic Text
    Example: [i]Italics[/i]
  • Underlined Text
    Example: [u]Underlined[/u]
  • Website link
    Link to another website or URL
    Example: [url]http://www.website.com/[/url]

Rate this talk with three clicks. You can choose 3 words, or vote for the same word 3 times.

Why register with the iai?
  • All you can watch
    Unlimited access to hundreds of hours of debates and talks from the world's leading minds, all for free.
  • Have your say
    Join the iai community and engage in conversation and debate around the issues that matter.
  • Hear it first
    Be the first to hear about our video releases, articles and tickets to our festival HowTheLightGetsIn.