Philosophy for our times: cutting edge debates and talks from the world's leading thinkers

Is Religion Dangerous?:

Faith, authority, and power

Welcome to iai tv. You are limited to 20 minutes of video a month without signing up. X
Membership is completely free, and gives you unlimited access to our videos, articles, courses and much more
Already a member?
You have used half of your monthly limit of videos. Sign up to continue watching. X
Membership is completely free, and gives you unlimited access to our videos, articles, courses and much more
Already a member?
You’ve reached your monthly video limit.

Want to see more?

Sign up to continue watching. Membership is completely free, and gives you unlimited access to our videos, articles, courses and much more.
Already a member? .
IAI TV videos are for personal use only. For commercial or educational licensing please contact TVF International
  • The Debate

    Is Religion Dangerous?

    Religion presents itself as a haven of peace and goodwill amid the greed and aggression of the secular world. But is this an illusion? Would it be wiser to see religion as a dangerous authoritarian game, or do we require a plurality of belief systems to offset the monolith of scientific knowledge?

    The Panel

    Biologist Rupert Sheldrake and Bishop Richard Harries debate with philosopher and writer Julian Baggini and psychologist Nicholas Humphrey.

    In association with the New Statesman.

  • Find out more about speakers

Jump to what you want to see in the debate
  • Julian Baggini
    The Pitch
    Atheism is a beneficial belief about the world
  • Rupert Sheldrake
    The Pitch
    Religion has a positive role to play in the world
  • Richard Harries
    The Pitch
    Religion is an approach to social reform and understanding
  • Nicholas Humphrey
    The Pitch
    Religion is simply self-deception
  • The Debate
    Theme One
    Is religion dangerous?
  • The Debate
    Theme Two
    Science vs. religion
Want to learn more about our speakers?
Join the conversation

to post comments or join now (only takes a moment). Don't have an account? Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or Google to get started:

RobertDF on 04/01/2015 2:56pm

Surley what Nicholas Humphrey means to say at 23.55 is not "people who think about it answer 5p", but *50p*. Because 50p for the ball plus 60p for the bat equals £1.10 for the bat and the ball, and also makes the bat cost 10p more than the ball. But if the ball was 5p, as he says, the bat, costing 10p more than the ball, would cost 15p, and the total for both would come to 20p, not £1.10. Yours, a rational religious believer.

jawoww on 25/10/2013 5:39pm

TSituation you raise a valuable if ill-worded point, but I think what Snooki is trying to say is actually that this never really grows to become the debate it could be as the panellists are all arguing from different definitions. Julian thinks its a chance to talk about the exciting 'danger' of religion which is good will, a bit of a curve ball that definitely doesn't work. Rupert Sheldrake goes off on one about scientists again (see anything he's ever written), Richard Harries and Nicholas Humphrey's do alright, a bit stuck out on their own though because the chair isn't really listening to a word anyone is saying. It's a great question though, and I think many interesting points are raised.

TSituation on 25/10/2013 5:17pm

@Snooki, what do you think the primary definition is then? Is science not the antithesis of religion? And therefore is it not only natural that a debate geared to deplore or defend religion might devolve into what you call the 'same old debate'. Some questions never grow old, particularly ones that are so pertinent today.

snooki on 25/10/2013 12:52pm

I can't help but feel like the panellists all defined 'danger' in such different ways that there was no real constructive debate regarding the primary issue here. This devolved to much into the same old science vs. religion argument, and didn't really deal with whether or not there is something intrinsic to religion itself that has led to centuries of crusades, genocides, the inquisition etc.

Copy and paste the code below to embed or link to this video.

Embed options
  • Video Seek
    Converted to a link which jumps to that point in the video
    Example: 00:34
  • Bold Text
    Example: [b]Bold[/b]
  • Italic Text
    Example: [i]Italics[/i]
  • Underlined Text
    Example: [u]Underlined[/u]
  • Website link
    Link to another website or URL
    Example: [url][/url]

Rate this talk with three clicks. You can choose 3 words, or vote for the same word 3 times.

Why sign up for the iai?
  • Discover new ideas
    Free and unlimited access to hundreds of hours of debates, talks and articles from the world's leading minds, as well as courses that rival top academic institutions.
  • Have your say
    Join the iai community and engage in conversation and debate around the issues that matter.
  • Hear it first
    Be the first to hear about our video releases, articles and tickets to our upcoming events.
Sign me up