Philosophy for our times: cutting edge debates and talks from the world's leading thinkers

On the Side of the Angels:

Can politicians be moral?

Enjoying this video? Why not to get exclusive and unlimited access to all our content.
Already have an account? .
To continue watching, to get exclusive and unlimited access to all our content.
Already have an account? .
You have watched your monthly limit of videos. to view an unlimited number of videos and articles.
Already have an account? .
IAI TV videos are for personal use only. For commercial or educational licensing please contact TVF International
  • The Debate

    On the Side of the Angels

    The Left has traditionally seen itself as having the moral high ground. But is it an illusion to suppose that any political position is on the side of the angels? Is it time for politics to abandon claims to righteousness or would this be to deny its very purpose?

    The Panel

    Former London Mayor Ken Livingstone, eminent ethicist Baroness Onora O'Neill and cabinet minister to Thatcher and Major Peter Lilley consider the place of morality in politics.

  • Find out more about speakers

Jump to what you want to see in the debate
  • Peter Lilley
    The Pitch
    Conservatism does strive toward moral goals
  • Ken Livingstone
    The Pitch
    Collectivist ideologies are morally superior to individualist ones
  • Onora O'Neill
    The Pitch
    No political party has a monopoly on values
  • The Debate
    Theme One
    Can policy be ethical?
  • The Debate
    Theme Two
    Morality, markets, and power
  • The Debate
    Theme Three
    Should politicians be moral?
Want to learn more about our speakers?
Join the conversation

to post comments or join now (only takes a moment). Don't have an account? Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or Google to get started:

MariaHana on 27/09/2013 4:33pm

I think they're right. All of them. Despite what the tabloids might want you to believe, there's no pot of goodness that is held by any political party, institution, country or even individual. The Tories are not inherently evil, the labour not inherently good. They all want to lead and have different ideas about how the best way to do it is.

It's a deeper question about the nature of democracy as it stands, whether there is even a place for morality in politics. Current decision making is based almost entirely on emotive issues with no long-term change potential. The aim of the parties is to get into power and stay in power which encourages more than a certain degree of amorality in getting there and a further dose to stay there. And I don't think the issue lies squarely with power-hungry politicians, it's also the electorate that cannot reliably think in terms of a greater good. The idea of an 'enhanced democracy' such as a geniocracy could lessen these issues.

Edrik on 26/09/2013 3:10pm

This Peter Lilley is quite a different beast from the lambasted climate change denier we've recently seen him as. For the first time in living memory I found myself agreeing with many of his points.

Copy and paste the code below to embed or link to this video.

Embed options
  • Video Seek
    Converted to a link which jumps to that point in the video
    Example: 00:34
  • Bold Text
    Example: [b]Bold[/b]
  • Italic Text
    Example: [i]Italics[/i]
  • Underlined Text
    Example: [u]Underlined[/u]
  • Website link
    Link to another website or URL
    Example: [url][/url]

Rate this talk with three clicks. You can choose 3 words, or vote for the same word 3 times.

Why sign up for the iai?
  • All you can watch
    Unlimited access to hundreds of hours of debates and talks from the world's leading minds, all for free.
  • Have your say
    Join the iai community and engage in conversation and debate around the issues that matter.
  • Hear it first
    Be the first to hear about our video releases, articles and tickets to our festival HowTheLightGetsIn.