Author
Nick Enfield
Professor at the Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney, director of Sydney Social Sciences and Humanities Advanced Research Centre, and author of Language vs. Reality: Why Language is Good for Lawyers and Bad for Scientists.
Professor at the Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney, and author of Language vs. Reality: Why Language is Good for Lawyers and Bad for Scientists.
Professor at the Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney, director of Sydney Social Sciences and Humanities Advanced Research Centre, and author of Language vs. Reality: Why Language is Good for Lawyers and Bad for Scientists.
Professor at the Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney, and author of Language vs. Reality: Why Language is Good for Lawyers and Bad for Scientists.
Nick Enfield Articles
More Articles
On the cusp of the unnatural
Idealism, panpsychism and science
Antirealism and the analytic-continental split
The new world of metamodernism
Truth isn't correspondence with the facts
Wittgenstein's Tractatus at 100
Science can't state all the facts
The Return of Metaphysics: Hegel vs Kant
The Return of Idealism: Russell vs Hegel
Common sense leads philosophy astray
Derrida and the trouble with metaphysics
Analytic philosophy has a language problem
Consciousness and higher spatial dimensions
The Return of Metaphysics: Russell and Realism
After Metaphysics: Rorty and American Pragmatism
Freedom from nature: the ultimate enslavement
Seeing is not perceiving
Wittgenstein was a metaphysician
There is no escaping metaphysics
Why the attempt to bury metaphysics failed
After postmodernism
The possible worlds of Saul Kripke
World Philosophy Day: 13 questions for our century
Most truths cannot be expressed in language
21st century metaphysics: Leaving Fantasy Behind
Common sense is not a good guide to reality
Wittgenstein: science can’t tell us about God
Schopenhauer vs Hegel: progress or pessimism?
Spinoza Reborn
Rethinking truth