Anonymity was once seen as a key feature of the internet and essential for protecting free expression and privacy. It would allow us to speak truth to power, explore ideas without fear, and avoid surveillance. No wonder the protection of anonymity was enshrined in international human rights law. But many argue today this ideal is fractured and has supercharged hate, aggression, and polarisation.  Studies show that anonymity often fosters increased aggression, diminishes self-awareness, and contributes to political extremism. And many argue that our attitude towards anonymity is hypocritical. We insist on privacy for ourselves while demanding complete transparency from our leaders.

Should we abandon anonymity entirely as a threat to social order and a vehicle for criminality?  Since 87% of people can already be identified using just three pieces of anonymised data might anonymity in any case become impossible? Alternatively, is privacy essential to being fully human and a core legal right that should be applied to everyone, including the rich, famous and the powerful.

Stay tuned as we release the full panel and programme for IAI Live August: The Price of Being No One.