Authenticity, Alienation and Privilege

Do the privileged confront alienation differently?

Picture a bunch of relatively impecunious PhD students, in an effortlessly mangy pub, in a Scottish fishing village. A fellow apprentice philosopher, American, puffs at her cigarette and coughs out some angst: “So I guess this grad school thing isn’t working out for me. No jobs, no nothing. I’m going back to California and, like, get a cushy job with my family’s real estate company.” Me, inadequately: “Mmm-hmm.” Her: “Y’know, imagine me at a party, telling someone I’m a realtor. People are gonna run a mile. And I’m gonna be bored out of my mind.” “In a sense”, I reply, “You might be right.” Was she?

It seems to me there are two things going on in our friend’s lamentation. First, the worry about becoming a centrifugal force for fellow partiers. I’m going to suggest that’s about authenticity, or lack thereof. Second, the worry about bottomless tedium. Arguably that’s about alienation. Let’s take the two issues in turn, and then see how they may relate to each other.

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

Mark J. 23 March 2018

The picture of precarious academic life is inaccurate. The author's friend really has no idea what precarious existence as a philosopher is like, and that casual ignorance is half the problem with this essay. Teaching a lot--- which is required for survival if you are adjunct--- is incompatible with serious reflection. I suspect Enzo Rossi simply does not know the facts about academic precariousness. Or life in the Netherlands might be different from other countries. Teaching many hours for low pay deprives a person of the ability think. Officially, Rossi concedes that point, but the article won't hang together if we insist upon it, give it the proper weight.Teaching a lot is just too tiring, too draining. Excessive teaching is mind- numbing and spirit crushing ( to borrow two phrases) --- and that apart from the insecurity involved.
If someone is in a position to choose between real estate agent and precarious philosopher, they are already privileged--- valid point. But it ignores the narrowing of possibilities resulting from choices. It is not inauthentic to give weight to one' s past decisions, and what they have made one. There are choices that carry heavy weight into the future, and the hard part is to fully grasp their consequences. But this point is far from the consciousness of the drinkers Rossi describes.
The remark about Marx seems tangential to larger social issues. . The deep point is that a divided society,,--- with injustice so built in that we have no alternative to being part of others' oppression-- because all clothes are made in sweat shops-- is a society that is unstable. That people are not poor, but are unhappy with their white collar , BS jobs, , may go against something Marx said, possibly, but why mention it when there are bigger issues where Marx was right? It is a sort of accounting, more than insight.

Laura Cole 24 November 2017

well!!