Between Knowing and Believing

Can we be certain that what we now think are facts are not merely beliefs?

Like everyone else, I long to know and embrace what is true and trustworthy. Yet as I get older, I have reluctantly come to the view that I know less and believe more – not because I have lapsed into some form of credulity, but rather because much of what I once thought was knowledge now seems to be opinion or belief. It leaves us with the awkward question, which we need to confront honestly: how can we be sure that what we think we now know is not in fact simply a belief? And is the difference between them partly a matter of our location in the historical process?

But let me return to the idyll of my intellectual youth. I was studying the natural sciences at high school, and had set my heart on going to Oxford to study chemistry – in my view, the most interesting and rewarding of the sciences. I loved science partly because of my sense of wonder at the vast complexity of the natural world. I knew what Albert Einstein meant when he spoke of a “rapturous amazement”, and longed to grasp the full truth about this strange yet wonderful world in which I had been placed.

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Join the conversation

shane watson 25 May 2024

The clapgeek Canadian Investment Funds Course (CIFC) offered by the IFSE Institute is a premier certification for financial professionals in Canada. This certification is crucial for those looking to gain a competitive edge in the investment sector. It equips candidates with the necessary knowledge and skills to sell mutual funds and other investment products effectively. Achieving the CIFC designation demonstrates a high level of expertise and commitment to professional excellence.

Louis Charles 19 March 2019

If a person is educated by academic science and goes to live in Amazon jungle alone by seven years, as I did, he/she leaves the jungle with a very different rationality, a new world view. By this way was born The Matrix/DNA Theory, which has a website. The believed schollar world falls down. The explanation is that urban modern life leads humans far away of the real natural world, and the jungle bring them back. There was no origins of life, there is no genetic code, atoms and astronomic systems has all principles of life's properties, when we are thinking that we are watching evolution, the thru is that we are seeing merely steps of a universal process of reproduction, and so on... Ok, since, the theory is based on those scientific proved facts, why it is so different? I think that there are several waya to connect the data, each one arriving to its specific big picture. The big picture acts as feed-back while re-interpreting all data.

Abraham Joseph 28 January 2019

Congrats IAI TV for bringing this article! It was a very rarely discussed subject!

Philosophy of science and rationality deserves serious rethinking: http://argumentsagainstscientificpositivism.blogspot.com/2018/12/a-rational-sensible-review-of.html?m=1