Diekemper vs Barbour: The Dance of Time - part 2

Arguing about past and future misses what matters.

Read part 1: Joseph Diekemper sets out the hypothesis that the present is nothing but a border between the past and the future.

 

Philosophers and physicists often think about time in very different ways. In fact, among themselves so do physicists; it is not easy to find two who agree in all details or even in their overall concepts. In this note, I will mention some of the ways in which my views differ from those of Joseph Diekemper and also from mainstream physics.

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation