Does ‘Mental Illness’ Exist?

The Problem with Psychiatric Diagnosis

Does ‘mental illness’ exist? I have taken as my title one of my least favourite questions. Although often posed to critics of psychiatric practice like myself, it actually makes very little sense. In unpicking it, I hope to show that we have better ways forward than the current, largely unchallenged understandings of emotional distress which do not reflect reality – either in terms of the evidence, or in terms of people’s lives.

The question really needs re-phrasing in two parts. If we framed the first part as ‘Do people really experience extreme forms of distress such as suicidal despair, hearing hostile voices, crippling anxiety and mood swings?’ then of course the answer is yes. As a clinical psychologist who has worked in the field of mental health for over three decades, and as a human being who is not immune from distress myself, I know this very well. But my answer to the implied second part ‘Are these experience best understood as “mental illnesses”?’ is a definite no. The concept of ‘mental illness’ obviously exists, as do the concepts of witches, ghosts and God – but the idea that the very real experiences subsumed under this term are best explained as medical disorders does not have, and has never had, any evidence to support it.

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Join the conversation

Steve Carnes 6 May 2020

Thank you so much. This really strikes home for me.

John Flagg 11 January 2020

Possibly the best supporting evidence for this view is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (now in its 5th edition). This thick volume (from my forays into it) seems to define just about any and every minor deviation from a (what seems to me wholly imaginary) "norm" as a "mental disorder". My favorite example is Asperger's Syndrome which is broadly enough defined that just about anyone with mild introversion "qualifies". Thumbing through the "DSM" (as it's called) can be both a humorous and a depressing (uh-oh) exercise. My own "Bible" on the subject is Thomas Szasz's "The Myth of Mental Illness" published decades ago. So-called "diagnoses" like these hardly have the objectivity of their strictly medical counterparts and the proliferation of these diagnoses in the last couple of decades ought itself to be evidence that it's simply what psychotherapists and psychologists do to stay in business (so to speak).