In this issue of IAI News, a head to head from two combatants in the recently released IAI tv debate ‘After the End of Truth’ which has caused something of a storm. The debate was not short of disagreement. On one side one of the world’s most influential analytic philosophers, John Searle, was defending realism and philosophy’s classical values: objectivity and truth. On the other philosopher and director of the IAI, Hilary Lawson, argued that realism had failed and an independent reality was a fantasy. So we’ve given both of them a right to reply.
Editorial: Ultimate Proof
We think evidence decides the matter. Yet even suicide bombers think they have evidence to support their cause.
31st July 2015
Continue reading
Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.
Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Latest Releases
Join the conversation