Expert Lies

Is expertise simply a form of institutional power?

We rely on experts in every field. Yet from economists to climate scientists they hold wildly disparate views. Might the very idea of objective knowledge be illusory and expertise be a form of institutional power? If we were more sceptical would it lead to democracy or bring chaos?

Matthew Parris is a writer, broadcaster and former Conservative MP. He writes columns for the Times and the Spectator as well as presenting Radio 4’s Great Lives. Here he speaks to the IAI about expertise, vested interests, and the importance of a healthy kind of scepticism.

 

Daniel Rhodes: In the debate on IAI TV you talked about the threat of “technocracy” or a “rule of experts that might be considered a threat to democracy”. Do you see the experts themselves a threat to democracy or is it a tyranny of data that we should guard against?

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

mickofemsworth 3 January 2016

I would agree completely with Matthew Parris's arguments. However one issue which is seldom acknowledged is that expertise is often unnecessarily complicated and divorced from common sense - not usually deliberately, but there is almost never any attempt to simplify expertise. I think there is a lot of scope to simplify a lot of expertise - with statistics being an important example. I am trying to develop this argument at http://woodm.myweb.port.ac.uk/SL/simplelearning.htm and http://woodm.myweb.port.ac.uk/SL/statistics.htm.