Sergey Shevchenko 8 February 2024

This TVI article is an example of mainstream philosophical publications, where the author addresses to fundamental phenomena/notions “Matter” and “Consciousness”,

- fundamentally having at that [as all other authors in mainstream philosophy and sciences, since in the mainstream philosophy and sciences all really fundamental phenomena/notions, first of all in this case “Matter”, “Consciousness”, “Space”, “Time”, “Energy”, “Information”, are fundamentally completely transcendent/uncertain/irrational]

- only some transcendent imagination about what he writes about means.

Correspondingly this TVI article really is nothing else than some speculative set of speculative really scientifically ungrounded wordings that have too indirect relation to what really exists and happens in material structures and in humans’ consciousnesses.

The fundamental phenomena/notions above can be, and are, rigorously scientifically defined only in the Shevchenko-Tokarevsky’s philosophical 2007 “The Information as Absolute” conception, recent version of the basic paper see
in Google, arXiv

- where [more concretely in the Planck scale informational physical model, see links in the linked paper above], including, it is rigorously scientifically shown that in any/every real physical

[i.e. if we don’t say about some cases in some spiritual practices, say in Yoga, etc., ]

experiments any “observer problem” fundamentally cannot, and so doesn’t, exist.

Though, of course, some “observer problems” exist in the purely human’s consciousnesses product “mathematics”; say, oligophrenics cannot prove a lot of Euclidean geometry theorems; but by no means these [non-Euclidean geometry, etc.] theorems cannot be proven at all by some other “observers”.

rrwilla 7 February 2024

Interesting piece. Consciousness is always the epistemological starting point, no matter what the field!