Contemporary metaphysicians ask deep questions about the structure of reality but answer them with unreliable, untested intuitions. Although philosophers like Alexander Kaiserman argue that logical argument can tell us which intuitions are valid, to be useful to anyone, metaphysics must apply comprehensive models of the world and start asking questions that really matter writes Craig Callender.
To understand my concerns about the direction of analytic metaphysics, let’s begin with a little game. I’ll describe a simple scenario. You guess what will happen.
Image Attribution: Lily Callender
1. You’re in a car stopped at a red light. You hold a helium balloon. The light turns green and the car starts to accelerate forward. Release the balloon. In what direction does it go, if any?
2. Pierce a small hole in both the cap and bottom of an ordinary plastic water bottle filled with water. Drop the bottle. Water ceases to flow out while it falls. Refill and throw the bottle up in the air. What will happen?
3.Take two potatoes and attach them with an elastic. Hold them horizontally level under a bit of tension and drop them. The two potatoes hit the ground at the same time. Try again with the potatoes oriented almost vertically, still attached by the elastic. Release. Which potato hits the ground first, if any?
The answers are at the end of this article. Take a peek and see how you did.
Good physical intuitions are ones that are in harmony with good theory. My point is that some areas of metaphysics lack this.
Join the conversation