The divide between science and religion is often seen to be irreconcilable. The two rarely meet, and most scientists fear being seen as having religious beliefs, fearing their reputation and career. This was no clearer the case than in the 1920s. Conflict between science and religious fundamentalism overshadowed nuance, argues Samual McKee. Scientists such as Arthur Eddington, who maintained science and religion could coexist, have been ignored. We should reject religious fundamentalism and scientific fundamentalism alike.
Perhaps the most underappreciated period in the history of the dialogue between science and religion is the interwar era of 1918-1939. This is all the more perplexing due to it being the most revolutionary era in modern physics. The figures, books and disputes were as impactful as any time since Newton, yet they rarely feature outside of deep, academic articles.
Join the conversation