Much of modern physics hinges on the notion of a smooth ‘continuum’. But as Professor of Theoretical Physics Sumati Surya argues, our lived experience point to something else: discreteness. Surya argues that spacetime isn’t infinitely divisible but instead built from discrete elements and their causal relationships – there is a “fundamental minimal size below which spacetime loses its meaning”.
What is the ‘substance’ of spacetime?
We are schooled early on, to imagine the ‘real line’, by inserting between any two points on the number line, an uncountable infinity of numbers, the so-called ‘irrationals’. Even as children we are aware that physical objects have an atomicity – if broken too fine, they lose any semblance of self. A continuum-like sheet of paper can only withstand so much tearing or folding, before it gives way to dust. Yet, we are told, there is a reality beyond this, literally that of the ‘reals’, where every division offers an uncountable infinity of further divisions, which never ever stops. Thus, the platonic ‘reality’ of a continuum overrides the physical, experiential reality of finiteness and discreteness.
___
At the Planck scale, spacetime comes into its own, as physical substance, the point at which the myth of the continuum dissolves into the dust of spacetime. Yet, most theories of quantum spacetime are framed in the continuum, where spacetime can be broken into bits, ad-nauseam, at scales arbitrarily smaller than the Planck scale.
___
So strong is this image, that much of modern mathematics, and hence physics, is predicated on the existence of a continuum. It is of course a brilliant mathematical ruse to use continuum structures – without this there would be no calculus, an essential tool for physics since Isaac Newton. This ruse continues to serve us well today. In Quantum Field Theory, used to define the standard model of particle physics, spacetime is a background, non-dynamical structure and the tools of the continuum help us calculate cross sections of various physical processes. The continuum serves as a perfectly good approximation in General Relativity as well. Though spacetime is dynamical, it is classical, and hence defined at large scales. Thus, the tools of differential geometry allow various physical observables to be calculated – from gravitational waves produced by the merger of two blackholes, to the largest cosmological features of spacetime. In both theories one is shielded from the very smallest of scales, the ultraviolet, at which the structure of spacetime may itself be very different.
SUGGESTED VIEWING The reality beyond spacetime With Donald Hoffman
Join the conversation
Brian Balke 12 April 2026
Any theory of space-time that does not produce exactly three particle generations with increasing mass cannot be called (in Einstein's framing of the influence of mass on space-time) a theory of physics. Given that requirement, this writing should be recognized as mathematical analysis of the sort that assumes the contradictory postulates of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics can be resolved formally, without reference to physical fact.
That General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics both fail to address the criterion above suggests STRONGLY that they are not fundamental. I found the way forward by introducing structure to the particles that both theories consider to be "fundamental." The higher-mass particle generations are then revealed to be excitations of the ground state represented by the first generation. This is not a new strategy for solving problems in fundamental physics. I am continually astonished that it has escaped consideration by theorists.
Nick Harkiolakis 10 August 2025
There is an SSRN paper that discusses a 1D discrete universe under only one force that can express both gravity, electricity, and nuclear.
Here is the abstract:
A one-dimensional discrete universe model is developed, featuring a single type of force expressed as a power law. This model can simulate the observed forms of electrostatic, nuclear, and gravitational forces. The observed forms of electrostatic, nuclear, and gravitational forces all emerge as expressions of this single force. Interactions between the entities or particles within the one-dimensional universe are examined, and analogies to mass and charge are established. Inherent characteristics of this universe include expansion when "masses" are added and an increase in “mass” with acceleration.