The multiverse is metaphysics, not science

What's missing in the multiverse debate

The multiverse theory has gained popularity as, among other things, a way to explain our universe’s apparent fine-tuning for life. Against the theory, many argue that while the multiverse could account for life in some universe, it fails to explain why there is life in our universe specifically. But, as Quentin Ruyant argues, both sides of this debate fail to appreciate one crucial thing: the context in which we observe life. While there are valid reasons to reject the multiverse, the “this universe” objection is not one of them.

 

The fine-tuning argument for the multiverse

Our universe seems to be miraculously fine-tuned for life. According to physics, if the value of cosmological constants were slightly different, it would not have the same long lasting structure, and life would be impossible. How can we explain it? Perhaps God wanted there to be life, and designed our universe in this way. But here is another explanation: if there are many universes, each with different values for cosmological constants, then it’s probable that at least some of them have the right constants for life. And of course, as living organisms, we happen to live in one such universe: there’s no mystery.

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

Themis Matsoukas 15 November 2024

It is incomprehensible to me what the “fine tuning” of the universe even means. It is as if physics has caught up with Middle-Ages theology.