The resonance of violence

The reality of virtual and symbolic crimes

Symbolic acts of violence are all around us but when we direct a virtual character to commit a heinous crime, or if we rip (or delete) a photograph of someone we hate, our malicious intentions are morally wrong. Our virtual acts of violence are not innocent, writes Christopher Bartel as part of a series with Aesthetics for Birds.

 

Is it ever morally wrong to commit violent or immoral acts in a video game? Video games are just images, right? No matter what I do in a video game, I am just interacting with images, and harming an image doesn’t cause any real-world harm. So, all of my actions in games must be morally neutral. This is a perfectly reasonable (and common) line of thought. But I think it’s wrong. Here’s why.

Forget about video games for a moment. Let me ask you a different question: is it ever morally wrong to harm a photograph? Photographs are just glossy pieces of paper that share a visual resemblance to people, places, and things. Like video games, photographs are just images.

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

Andrew Walker 14 June 2021

Very useful post. This is my first time i visit here. I found a lot of interesting things in your blog especially its discussion. Really good article, keep it up. This website provides a <a href="https://www.ethicalhacker.net/members/fake-instagram-post/profile">fake Instagram post maker</a> that helps you to hide your personal data.

Minnie S 8 June 2021

Very good to read something which takes this seriously. It is far too easy to rely on a distinction between reality and fantasy to avoid examining our inner states. Is the argument ultimately one of moral intuition (taking the experiment in the last paragraph)?