The Secrets of Experience

Is it really impossible to know another's mind?

Could you ever hope to observe – visually or otherwise – the conscious experiences of others? Before venturing an answer to this question, it is important to understand what is being asked and why answers have proved so elusive.

Philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists vigorously debate solutions to what David Chalmers calls the Hard Problem of consciousness: how are conscious experiences to be reconciled with our emerging understanding of the material world? Many who accept that consciousness has a neurological ‘substrate’ reject the reduction of the mental to the physical because this seems effectively to eliminate the mental. On the one hand, we seem intimately familiar with qualities of our conscious experiences, experiences that mediate our awareness of the physical universe. On the other hand, the qualitative nature of these experiences seem altogether to elude the physical sciences. From the scientific perspective, conscious phenomena seem alien and utterly mysterious.

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

sam karol 8 July 2021

Options when you have no idea for gain some notepad computer rules about your system.

selena kale 22 June 2021

Looking forward to you sharing more information, I have been looking for it for days.
<a href="https://driving-directionsmaps.com/">driving directions</a>

Mark Hoskins 9 August 2017

Most of this is trivially true. However the redness of the tomato is not a property of the tomato. The property of the tomato is its tendency of reflecting light at a particular frequency. The redness we perceive is a property of our perception. So it seems nothing has really been solved.

Abraham Joseph 4 August 2017

Author has very clearly exposed that, the hard-problem is a humdrum; a silly issue unnecessarily extending to the boarders of absurdity! Thoughts or metal state of a man is often Kaleidoscopic at any given moment because, it not the exact content of actual thought that is important, but what it achieves at the end.It is similar to the way a lion eats his prey; the pattern of different incidents will not ever be exactly similar except the final result,ie finishing the meal. Or, they are like the different pattern of steps one takes to walk a path one daily cover; the pattern of his covering that distance each day will be different, but he reaches his destination everyday routinely.
Hard problem is merely a problem created for its ow sake and imaginary hardness. Chief issue that created the problem is Science's obsession for having every knowledge an objective status! This obsession still haunts her despite QM's clear cut revelation that,nothing can be 'objective' in universe.
This commentator would love to share with every open minded, and genuinely 'truth seeking' men of science and philosophy, two of his carefully studied blog-posts, one on 'human thoughts', and the other on the tussle between subjectivity and objectivity:
http://hiddenobserveronthelimitationsofmind.blogspot.in/2015/01/an-attempt-to-understand-phenomenon-of.html
http://argumentsagainstscientificpositivism.blogspot.in/2017/02/how-pathetically-subjective-man-created.html