The white hole illusion

The Big Bang was not a white hole

In a previous article, Alon Retter argued the big bang was a white hole – a time-reversed black hole, the possible existence of which has been brought to popular attention by Carlo Rovelli. But the big bang and the white hole have crucial differences in their structures, which creates more questions than answers, writes Geraint F. Lewis.

 

Where did our universe come from? What gave birth to all the matter that formed into stars, planets, and people? Astronomers tell us that our cosmos was born in a fiery event almost fourteen billion years ago and has been expanding ever since, but while this Big Bang picture accurately explains the universe's evolution, the ultimate origin remains mysterious. A radical suggestion is that our universe is a white hole, the mirror image of a black hole, but is this physically reasonable?

To answer this, we will need to understand what a white

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Join the conversation

James Moffett 27 February 2024

Hi Geraint. I enjoyed your book, with Luke Barnes, The Cosmic Revolutionary's Handbook. In it you mention Smoller and Temple's Shockwave Cosmology inside a Black Hole (PNAS 2003) which you describe as a white hole cosmology. Although, if I understand correctly, they think that we are still inside an expanding black hole, following an explosion inside it. At first I though this seemed very strange as I though that a black hole crushed everything inside it. However I found out that during the brief time of the collapse of a star to form a black hole, there is 'flat' spacetime (like the majority of the observable universe) inside the black hole event horizon. Only later on does this expanding black hole briefly become a white hole in the surrounding space. I see that Smoller, Temple and Vogler have in made another, linked paper in which they consider that the acceleration of the expansion of the universe may be due to an under density caused by the shockwave and propose a test for that, linked, idea. I wonder if you know whether such a test has been conducted, or may be done? ( "An instability of the standard model of cosmology creates the anomalous acceleration without dark energy". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.)