How four women revolutionised ethics

Overcoming the fact-value distinction

The men who dominated British philosophy from the 1920s to the 1950s all agreed: there is a strict dichotomy between facts and values. The world itself contains only facts, values arise only from our own subjective judgements. But four brilliant women philosophers disagreed. Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley and Iris Murdoch thought the image of the world devoid of value was wrong. They would go on to change the field of moral philosophy forever, writes Benjamin J.B. Lipscomb.

 

Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley and Iris Murdoch met in Oxford as undergraduates and supported and inspired one another for the rest of their lives. I recently published a book about the interweaving lives and work of this extraordinary quartet of twentieth-century philosophers. When my publisher proposed a subtitle that referenced how they revolutionized ethics, I hesitated. Had these four revolutionized ethics? (Has anyone?)

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

Elizabeth Ann Curran 21 January 2022

A new book about these women: Metaphysical Animals-How Four Women Brought Philosophy Back to Life, by Clare Mac Cumhaill et Al.

hunter drift 10 January 2022

Those are wonderful women. They deserve to be honored!

Marilyn Crook 9 January 2022

Yes more please. Really interesting introduction!

Ann Gamsa 8 January 2022

I agree with Jesper Valgreen.

Jesper Valgreen 7 January 2022

Splendid review. Too bad it ends right where the plot thickens.