In Defence of Post-Truth

Are we better off without the concept of truth?

To believe what philosophers say about their field, you might be forgiven for thinking that they are seekers after the truth. However, as in so many other cases, you shouldn’t believe the hype. On the contrary, philosophers are the ultimate experts in a post-truth world. They see ‘truth’ for what it is: the name of a brand ever in search of a product which everyone is compelled to buy. This helps to explain why philosophers are most confident appealing to the truth when they are trying to persuade non-philosophers, be they in courtrooms or classrooms.

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

jj52 2 March 2017

There are a million, even a billion 'so called' truths.
What is true for one person is a lie to another, truth is subjective to ones beliefs and experiences and as we know each of us have different experiences from which we base our truth. Therefore post truth does not exist, it is a construct by which people are trying to understand the reality that has always been.

ost truth