Patricia Crouch 28 June 2021

I would like to read articles by authors whose statements have caused such an active discussion about the problems of transgender people. I would like such bold professors and associate professors to teach me. I am now preparing to enter the university, where it is very difficult to pass the qualifying stage, but I am attracted here by a good teaching staff. I will do my best to become a student of this university. I've already placed an order on https://www.lorservice.com/ I want to impress the admissions office. And this can only be done with a high-quality personal statement and letter of recommendation. Good luck for me.

Patricia Crouch 28 June 2021

I would like to read articles by authors whose statements have caused such an active discussion about the problems of transgender people. I would like such bold professors and associate professors to teach me. I am now preparing to enter the university, where it is very difficult to pass the qualifying stage, but I am attracted here by a good teaching staff. I will do my best to become a student of this university. I've already placed an order on <a href="https://www.lorservice.com/">letters of recommendation service</a> I want to impress the admissions office. And this can only be done with a high-quality personal statement and letter of recommendation. Good luck for me.

Rai Chad 25 September 2019

We refuse on principle to “co-platform” with those who seek, under the guise of “debate” with us, to persuade an audience that it should partner with them in advocating harm to us. bullet force

Breaded Circuits 23 September 2019

":. There are limits to civil and intellectual discourse beyond which speech acts are simply acts of violence."

Categorically false.

" These presuppositions are uniformed,(sic?) and fly in the face of evidence as well as years of feminist thought and activism. They preemptively delegitimate transgender people as speaking subjects."

In exactly the same fashion as your claims to 'truth' preemptively delegitimate discourse; discourse wherein your ideas are indefensible, hypocritical, and wilt before even the most basic of critiques or investigations.

George Tyrebyter 20 September 2019

Trans crybully losers cannot simply by fiat declare that they have won the debate. In fact, every day, the validity of the trans pretense is more and more transparently false. We normal folks are going to end the ability of M2F trans who pretend to be women to compete as women.

Cathy Sutcliffe 7 September 2019

My goodness. This retraction is nothing more than three so called academics making excuses for being too scared to engage in a public debate, which is respectful, and sorely needed in these days of Identity Politics. Why won't they submit to debate? I believe the entire trans community, especially those that have been manipulated and schooled by the the tans lobby, have been instructed not to engage with anyone or any group without knowing first what will be said. I believe this is because they know their ideology is too easily dis-proven. Postmodernism is not based in material reality, and is subjective to each individuals 'personal feelings', which is not a good platform if you are trying to 'prove' something. They conflate what the other academics have said into Hate Speech. No one with a mind would see it as hate speech for a moment. Reasoned arguments are essential for society to progress. Trans ideology is regressive, as we can see from their position of affirming gender norms in anyone who doesn't conform to patriarchal gender norms. I am sick of trans activists lying and exaggerating in the face of what the rest of us know as truth. How dare these 'so called academics' treat other academics like pariahs, and cast them as people who want violence against trans people. Not once have I heard another feminist advocate for violence against trans or non-binary people. It is always the other way around, which fits with their inversion of philosophical statements and theories. To take philosophy, and then turn it against the people is as right-wing as you can get. Maybe one day the transpeople who advocate violence against feminists and lesbians and children will come to realise that this movement was designed to further oppress WOMEN and Children, funded by billionaire philanthropists from America, and stop spreading and enforcing U.S foreign policy. ( Don't they ever wonder why they have advanced so easily? ) Any academic worth their degree should know this by now. I stand with all Women who know how this will effect them in the near future, which is to make Women sub-human and denied any rights at all. Why they can't see this yet is something that will bother me to the end of my days. Woman. Vagina. Womb. Cervix. Daughter. Mother. All words that we use to speak of our bodies and selves. What else could it be but erasure of Women as a class when they take our very words away from us,so we can not arggue for our sex-based rights! Ask yourselves why. WHY? Why is this happening? Because it has sod all to do with men who want to perform as WOMEN.

JaneDerbyshire 6 September 2019

There are a lot of 'straw man' arguments in the above, hyperbolic, comment. I'm very disappointed that the balancing articles, by Julie Bindel, Kathleen Stock and Holly Lawford-Smith are extremely difficult to find by searching, and aren't linked from this page. I've been sent a link to these articles, but you'd be hard pressed to know they were online otherwise. Women are ill-served when the trans community decides there can be #NoDebate, and refuses to engage with the type of questions which philosophers discuss on a daily basis. This often means people from the trans community hold forth on TV or radio with no-one present to challenge their more ridiculous claims - and IAI.TV is now doing the same. As I say, disappointing.