The hypocrisy of the West

How torture undermines reason

Reason grounds Western morality, with its respect for the individual and her freedom at its center. The force of this system has created a moral industry in the West - with think tanks, politicians and journalists broadcasting its goodness - but the continued use of torture undermines it all, argues Kishore Mahbubani.

 

One of the greatest joys of my life was studying Western philosophy, absorbing the wisdom of great Western thinkers from Socrates to Wittgenstein. The dedication of all those great thinkers, over thousands of years, to the power of logical reasoning was truly inspiring. Hence, for me, the power of the West was always associated with this commitment to using reason to understand and improve the world.

Western logic was always irrefutable. Plain logic would create irrefutable statements. Hence if the premise was “all dogs are animals”, the consequence of the claim “Fido is a dog” was the irrefutable statement that “Fido is an animal”. A similar rigour applied to moral reasoning. Hence, if a human being called X said “Human beings should not torture other human beings”, the irrefutable conclusion was that X was obliged to also say “I should not torture human beings”. The rigour of this logic is absolute. No exceptions are possible. Anyone who made the first claim and denied the second claim would be justifiably accused of hypocrisy.

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Join the conversation

Thorsten J. Pattberg, PhD 25 June 2021

What a Circus, Keep the Western Masses stupid: Shove Your Democracy Up Your Ass (from an ex-Harvard, ex-Tokyo, ex-Pekin... youtu.be/CCJ3ROpm6Mo #ger  #bel  #fra  #ita  #pol  #ned  #tur  #rus  #por  #swe  #fin  #den  #eng  #g7

Cennydd John 21 December 2020

As ever, hard to dispute this reasoning. Always found the resistance to this argument quite difficult to stomach, particularly amongst the more "intellectual" friends of mine - those I would have thought capable of seeing their own preferential bias and to then rationalise accordingly. But no, it seems the "us" vs "them" argument can always find justification for actions we would otherwise find abhorrent. Sad