The new threat to the Standard Model

A first step towards a new theory

W bosons and the standard model

A new experimental result has shaken the world of particle physics. The W boson, it turns out, is a lot heavier than we thought. This poses a challenge to our most successful and tested theory about the fabric of the universe so far: the Standard Model. And while this one experimental result might not be enough on its own to overthrow the theory, it already points in the direction of a theory that could, writes Martin Bauer.

 

Recently the mass of the W boson has been measured by the Collider Detector at Fermilab with unprecedented precision and a surprising result. The recent result disagrees wildly with all previous measurements of the W boson's mass, but this result is no fluke. To give you an idea of the precision of this latest measurement and  how unlikley it is that this result is a mistake, consider this: if you weigh yourself multiple times with different scales you would expect to see some discrepancy. But an equivalent discrapancy like the one between the most recent measurement and the previous measurements of the W boson's mass, would statistically occur only after you've weighed yourself 1 billion times.

21 08 12.Hints of a new fundamental force NEW Hints of a new fundamental force Read more Measuring the properties of the W boson precisely is very important. From stellar fusion to carbon dating, the mass of the W boson affects many calculations that underly our understanding of the Universe. For instance, its mass is linked to the lifetimes of other particles, which in turn are important for understanding how the Universe developed after the Big Bang. But perhaps the most important consequence of this latest measurement of the W boson’s mass is that it puts it in tension with our most successful theory about particle physics: the Standard Model.

What are W-bosons, and why is it hard to measure them?

At this point you are probably wondering: What is a W boson, what is it good for and what are the actual implications of this surprising result?

The W boson is a fundamental particle mediating the weak force, a force that we never experience directly because it only acts on subatomic distances. All other known fundamental forces give rise to bound systems: e.g. solar systems bound together by gravity, atoms bound together by the electromagnetic force and atomic nuclei bound by the strong force. The weak force does not give rise to such bound systems, but is crucial for many natural phenomena that affect our everyday life. The fusion process in the sun is initiated by hydrogen transforming into heavy hydrogen via the weak force. Without the W boson the sun would be very dim. All atoms we know are made from protons, neutrons and electrons yet there are many different particles around. Why do they never make atoms or more complicated structures? Because they decay rapidly due to the weak force.

What makes the weak force so unique is the fact that the W boson can change the charges of other particles it interacts with. It can turn an electron (charge -1) into a neutrino (charge 0), or a neutron (charge 0) into a proton (charge +1). Methods like carbon dating directly rely on this property. The slow decay of neutrons into protons in carbon isotopes lets us date archeological artefacts and would be impossible without the W boson.

Measuring the mass of the W boson directly is extremely challenging.

So much so that my experimental colleagues dubbed it ‘the hardest measurement in high-energy physics’. There are a numbers of reasons that make it so difficult:

First, W bosons are very heavy for elementary particles. A single W boson weighs 80 times as much as a proton. Accelerators are the only place in the world where the enormous energy can be leveraged to produce them. But once they are produced, W bosons decay immediately and determining their mass requires measurements of the decay products and reconstructing it from these measurements. To make things worse, the colliders that produce W bosons inevitably also produce hundreds and hundreds of other particles. Figuring out whether a W boson has been produced and making a measurement of its mass is rather like finding connecting puzzle pieces in a huge box full of them and then putting them together correctly - and some are missing and there is more than one way they could fit.

___

In contrast to many anomalies that have challenged the status of the Standard Model before, it is statistically almost impossible for the CDF result to be a fluke.

___

The Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDF) Collaboration has done this exercise with a dataset of four million W bosons collected from 2002 to 2011 at the Tevatron collider at Fermilab, about an hour outside of Chicago. Weighing the W boson took the collaboration over a decade to complete. And the results are spectacular. Not only did CDF deliver the most precise measurement of the W mass every achieved, their result disagrees with all previous measurements, putting it in direct tension with countless experiments that have confirmed the most successful theory high-energy physicists has ever developed: the Standard Model of Particle Physics. It cannot be overstated how remarkable this is: The CDF measurement is off by less than one in a thousand, but the precision achieved is one in ten thousand!

This enormous precision is the reason why this measurement caught the attention of physicists worldwide. In contrast to many anomalies that have challenged the status of the Standard Model before, it is statistically almost impossible for the CDF result to be a fluke. But if it is not a fluke, what is it then? Did the CDF experimentalists discover a first sign of new physics in their data?  

___

While a single measurement rarely establishes a new theory of physics, it can identify structures that could replace the Standard Model prediction.

___

The new challenge to the Standard Model

In the wake of the CDF announcement a twofold challenge emerges: A comprehensive analysis of all the tools and techniques applied to extract the W mass from the mountain of data is underway. Experimentalists will probe again and again whether there is any unaccounted uncertainty, any explanation in the measurement process for this almost impossible discrepancy.

In the meantime, theoretical physicists are asking the question about a different, more speculative origin. The structure of boson masses is a prediction of the Standard Model. This structure is very rigid. It is not possible to simply change the mass of the W boson without changes in other observables such as decays of heavy quarks and leptons, the mass measurement of the Z boson, and various other measurements that have confirmed the Standard Model structure over and over again. This is unless there is something else that changes this structure, something that has been missed by other experiments so far, something new and unexpected, manifesting itself in the collisions of the Tevatron collider.

___

A number of initial studies show that the presence of another Higgs boson, or novel heavy particles interacting with the W boson, as predicted in some theories of Dark Matter, could both be responsible for the discrepancy.

___

Theorists will carefully scrutinise the Standard Model calculations.It is clear that if the CDF measurement stands, the Standard Model alone will not be enough to explain all of our experimental data anymore. And while a single measurement rarely establishes a new theory of physics, it can identify structures that could replace the Standard Model prediction.

A number of initial studies show that the presence of another Higgs boson or novel heavy particles interacting with the W boson, as they are predicted in some theories of Dark Matter, could both be responsible for the discrepancy. If these new particles really shift  the W mass, they can also be produced elsewhere. Guided by theoretical studies, data from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at Cern will be combed for signs of these new particles and the results will narrow down possible explanations or produce further hints about the nature of the underlying physics.The LHC collides protons with a record 7 times the energy of the Tevatron with which CDF took their data. It has just started its third run and is projected to collect more data than the first two runs combined.   

Even if these searches come up empty-handed, eventually LHC data will allow for an equally or even more precise measurement of the W mass and confirm or contradict the CDF measurement.

The complexity of the ‘hardest measurement in high-energy physics’ makes this a very hard puzzle to solve. It will be with us for a while. But we physicists have long given up the belief that we can always predict where new physics will be found. Too often have we been blindsided by unexpected discoveries.

If we can say anything with certainty right now, it is that continued funding for fundamental research is indispensable. It took ten years to take the data and another ten years for the analysis and if we had cut funding at any point the ‘hardest measurement in high-energy physics’ would never have been completed and what we will learn from the impressive measurement by CDF would have remained buried in the data.

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

Mike Pollock 22 May 2022

Wow Bud. You hit it on the nail. These problems are what happens when science decided to create the universe from some unexplainable point.
All the energy we see was caused by gravity. It was caused by our universe turning itself into a gargantuan particle collider just like any of the ones here on Earth. Particle colliders create quark plasma shrapnel and our universe created quark plasma shrapnel as the galaxies. That's where all the energy came from to give the galaxies their energy and make them expand.
This W boson heaviness is due to science thinking that a cloud of gas and dust can create a star. This assumption puts all the emphasis on normal matter to create the gravity. This simultaneously ignores the other 95% of our universe which is dark matter. Unfortunately, dark matter is the field that is manipulated to create gravity just like Einstein surmised.
Edwin Hubble discovered the galaxies expanding, not the universe. All the problems science has are due to this theory that was concocted by a Belgian priest 100 years ago named Georges Lamaitre. He wanted the world to see the universe as he was taught it happened and the scientific community fell for it. Never mind any laws being applied to what happened 13.8 billion years ago. That aspect was come ignored. A collision happening in an already existing, static universe is the only way what we see could have happened.
The w boson heaviness, along with the muon wobble, are created by the dark matter showering us with trillions of electron neutrinos every second. These measurements are off because of the big bang theory. Black holes are misunderstood but the worst outcome of this theory is the insistence that fusion is the ultimate energy of the universe. It isn't, quark plasma is this energy. It is obvious that fusion isn't working because it has been created for 80 years never expelling more energy than was put into it. The real energy uses the strong force between quarks and the electron neutrinos of space that make up dark matter. Once quarks have been separated, it is the pressure and density of the field of electron neutrinos that is able to keep the quarks apart indefinitely. Dark matter becomes the endless catalyst for this reaction. As a result, the strong force between the quarks and electron neutrinos throws the neutrinos out of the reaction as gamma rays. The quarks and electron neutrinos create all the naturally occurring elements all by themselves from the outside of the mass inward. Supernovae simply do not exist. We live on an ex-black hole.

Bud Rapanault 19 May 2022

Here is the only physically meaningful statement in this article:

"But once they are produced, W bosons decay immediately and determining their mass requires measurements of the decay products and reconstructing it from these measurements."

What this means in terms of physics is that no one has ever observed a W boson. It also means that the "mass of the W" has been inferred from the observation of quotidian particles that can be observed. Calling an inferred estimate a precision measurement is disingenuous nonsense The W boson, like the Higgs and Z (not to mention quarks and gluons) have never been directly observed. They exist in the standard model, there is no evidence except via model dependent inference that they exist in physical reality.

According to the standard model, the W boson has a half-life of 3x10^-25 seconds. That time interval is too small to detect which means that the existence of the W is indistinguishable from its non-existent. This is very convenient for the standard model's proponents, who get to pretend to detect something they cannot possibly detect by inference from things they can detect, in this case electrons and muons. This is not a scientific approach to understanding physical reality; it is an unscientific philosophical approach called mathematicism.

Mathematicism is the scientifically unjustified belief that mathematics underlies and determines the nature of physical reality. Once that illogical Pandora's Box was opened in the 20th century and became the de facto operating paradigm for theoretical physics the decline of the standard models (particle physics and cosmology) into metaphysical nonsense was assured.

I want to be unequivocally clear about this. Observed physical reality does not contain quarks, gluons, W, Z, and Higgs bosons (this list is not exhaustive). The standard model does not resemble the physical reality we observe and measure. Science is supposed to be the study of those things we can observe and measure. Modern theoretical physics has devolved into the study of two simplistic models based on outdated (@100 year old) assumptions that the community appears intellectually incapable of reconsidering. Modern theoretical physics is an unscientific wasteland.