Both moral realism and relativism are wrong

Stripping morality of metaphysics

In what sense is morality objective? Moral realists argue that there are moral facts whose truth is independent of what anyone thinks, while moral relativists argue that moral claims are only true relative to a particular culture or society. In this article, Melis Erdur argues that both moral realism and moral relativism are self-defeating. She argues that we should dispense with overarching metaphysical stories of where morality comes from – moral shortcuts – and instead learn to stand firm in our own human convictions.

 

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation