Consciousness is a window onto a deeper reality

Mystical insights are beyond knowledge

We think that we experience reality, and on occasion, some have the impression that through special circumstances they are able to catch sight of a deeper insight, they feel they have got a sense of the ultimate nature of the world. In the past, this was most apparent in religious experiences. But, in contemporary times, it is most commonly found in psychedelic experiences. James Cooke here argues that these mystical experiences can reveal how consciousness itself is a window onto reality and that consciousness and reality exist in one and the same world.

 

In contemporary neuroscience, it is common to envision the brain as being fundamentally isolated from the outside world. Your brain sits in the darkness of the skull like a prisoner, one who only receives clues as to what is occurring in the wider world, clues provided by the senses. It is the job of the brain to conjure a vision of what could be occurring in the world beyond the bony confines of the cranium. This capacity to imagine the world and oneself within it is what we call consciousness.

Another perspective comes from contemplatives with expertise in exploring consciousness directly. During these explorations, it is common for such spiritual practitioners to experience radical changes in consciousness. These non-ordinary “mystical” states reveal insights regarding the nature of the mind. What’s more, many claim to also glean insights into the nature of reality itself.

___

Rather than directly providing information about reality, “mystical” experiences of union with the rest of reality may instead dispel delusional beliefs about the way the world is

___

Obviously we are made of the same stuff as the rest of reality, there is nothing special about the individual atoms that make you up. We gain knowledge not through individual physical particles of this kind, however, but through the mind. Immanuel Kant distinguished between what he called the “noumenal”, the world as it exists in itself, and the “phenomenal” world, the mental world of experience. How can experiences arising in the mind possibly provide information about the nature of the world in itself, beyond the mind?

  related-video-image SUGGESTED VIEWING AI consciousness cannot exist With Markus Gabriel

Rather than directly providing information about reality, “mystical” experiences of union with the rest of reality may instead dispel delusional beliefs about the way the world is. This reflects the tradition of negative theology, in which it is understood that the ground of being can only be approached through negation. What beliefs must we negate in order to come closer to reality as it is in itself?

Many spiritual practitioners come to the insight that one’s presumed separation from the rest of existence is just an idea, not a material reality. Science confirms this, with its view of living things as open systems that continually exchange material with the rest of the physical world. This insight can also generalise beyond oneself to every “thing” that we perceive. This too fits with what we know about the nature of categorical perception - the mind divides up the physical world in our experience, but the world itself is not actually divided along these perceived lines. The weed in your garden is not actually a weed in itself, different to the other plants; you merely perceive it as a weed. Boundaries between weeds and non-weeds do not exist outside of the mind. Negating our sense of personal separation from the world and our perception of independently existing objects can give the experience of insight into the holistic and interdependent nature of existence in general.

___

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

Grant Castillou 6 November 2024

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first.

What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing.

I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order.

My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at Jeff's UCI site.