Immigration and Identity

Has anywhere got immigration right?

It is mesmerizing to watch as the cancer of fear worms its way back into the human soul or imagination or wherever it lodges itself. For most of us the first reaction to such widespread fear is disbelief. The second? As it spreads and morphes into populism, racism and exclusion, we are often paralyzed, unable to imagine how to fight back. Mr. Trump has, in a tortured way, done Americans - perhaps all of us - a favour with the extremism of his first week in office. His racist, certainly illegal and probably unconstitutional orders are an abrupt wake-up call.

More than that, they are a warning to Washington's traditional allies to take care. Is this man a stable, trustworthy partner? It took him only a few hours to damage Theresa May's reputation. Canada is the United States’ closest ally - a 6000 kilometre border - and biggest trading partner. But Justin Trudeau is keeping his head down, using officials to negotiate arrangements behind the scenes. His reaction to Trump's anti-Muslim orders has been to purposely reiterate Canada's pro-immigration policy, without mentioning the United States or its president.

No one should be surprised that the growth in immigrants, refugees and migrants has been central to the releasing of such fear in Western society. This is an old tradition. Fear of the other. Promotion of fear of the other for political purposes. We are all affected when racist discourse is normalized. The attack on the Quebec City mosque is a tragic example of this. But the virtually unanimous reaction has been to reassert as strongly as possible the Canadian reality of and commitment to diversity and inclusive citizenship.

In such an atmosphere some people in Europe look at Canada and wonder why it is not suffering from the same agonies. At this point it is the only Western democracy not deeply divided on the issue of refugees and immigration in fact, the only country where the political class is largely and openly pro-immigration. This puts the country out on a cutting edge or a precipice. An exposed position.

___

"Trump’s racist, certainly illegal and probably unconstitutional orders are an abrupt wake-up call"
___

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

Peter Jones 3 March 2017

As an immigrant to Canada myself (from war torn, in spirit, USA) I have learned much from you and indigenous persons here about being a settler - Here in the country my ancestors fought against when settling Maine 400 years ago. Having read The Comeback, I have to wonder whether there are indigenous concerns for the outpouring of outreach to newcomer settlers when First Nations Canadians are receiving so little outreach or acknowledgment within society? The different approaches to immigration foreground our compassion and virtue, but don't take into account the very modernist, colonialist problems that led to distressed migration in the first place. In Canada we all but ignore the wars we fund and enable, and also overlook ignore the fact that Syrians. in particular, would like to return to their country if the violence was remediated. Its a bit colonizing of us to rush to citizenship as if its he only path forward and the best opportunity for "victims." As many Syrians are actually indigenous to their nation/region, in this case couldn't there be an empathic recognition of their desire for perhaps temporary asylum and a return to their homeland wen things are sorted out? And can we be honest about our complicity in the causes of their migration?

Could there be more "training for allyship" with the recognition that Canada isn't just a Crown commonwealth entity but a country based on treaties? And that newcomers are now assenting to be treaty people? Our ways of respecting others from indigenous cultures might then account for the relationship between cultures that both have thousands of years of original cultural history each to consider in the new relation?