Technology is the only thing that has ever reduced poverty

The world needs more technology, not less

Technology and poverty 3

Public debate increasingly casts technology as a threat — to jobs, to equality, even to civilisation itself. In this article, environmental activist Zion Lights challenges that narrative, showing that every major improvement in human wellbeing, from rising life expectancy to declining famine, has its roots in technological advance rather than moral evolution or political reform. Tracing developments from mechanised agriculture to AI-driven healthcare, Lights argues that technological innovation has quietly saved more lives than any social programme. Drawing on global evidence, it reveals why resisting technology out of fear risks entrenching the very poverty and vulnerability we seek to avoid.

 

Without technology, we’d still be living in poverty

Cultural memory is selective. We romanticize earlier centuries as if comfort, stability, and abundance were their default conditions. We inhabit the best-documented improvement in human wellbeing the world has ever seen, yet we are haunted by nostalgia for eras defined by scarcity and precarity. There is even a term for yearning for ages that we’ve never lived in—anemoia—which reflects a deep refusal to recognize that the best timeline is the one we inhabit now. Yet longing for imagined pasts obscures an important truth: agriculture, education, medicine, and global living standards have been transformed through technological advancement and innovation, and much of it in our lifetimes.

Across every essential domain of human survival, from food to knowledge to health, the modern world has broken patterns that endured for thousands of years, and the agent of that break is not moral enlightenment alone, but technology—the single force that has ever truly displaced poverty. Thanks to technological advancements, today is the best timeline humanity has ever occupied, and the evidence for this is overwhelming, whether we look at agriculture, education, healthcare, or almost any other measure of human wellbeing.

The blunt truth is that for most of human history, poverty was not an anomaly but the baseline condition of existence. Famine, disease, illiteracy, and deprivation were inescapable realities for the vast majority of people. Even the wealthiest societies of the past struggled to secure the basic necessities of life for most of their people. However privileged their elites may appear in hindsight, they lived with the same fundamental vulnerabilities as everyone else: food that spoiled without refrigeration, diseases that spread without vaccines, and injuries or infections that could turn fatal for lack of even the most elementary medical technologies. Material comfort did not insulate them from biological reality, and no amount of social hierarchy or political organization could compensate for the absence of the technologies that now make ordinary life safer than even royalty once experienced.

 

The world we grow

Let’s begin with agriculture. From the moment humans abandoned nomadic life and settled in order to grow food, the struggle to meet even basic calorie requirements has been a defining feature of our existence. For thousands of years, harvests rose and fell with the weather, famine shadowed every failed season, and entire civilizations could be undone by a single drought or blight. Stability was the promise of agriculture, but scarcity remained its constant companion.

Then came mechanization. Before this, farming was intensely laborious and yields were vulnerable to environmental fluctuations. Famines were frequent, and the labour of entire families barely sufficed to feed themselves. The introduction of mechanized plows, irrigation systems, and chemical fertilisers transformed the capacity of human labour. Agricultural productivity increased exponentially, food became cheaper and more reliable, and famine receded as a regular threat. These technological advances redefined the conditions of human survival.

___

Want to continue reading?

Get unlimited access to insights from the world's leading thinkers.

Browse our subscription plans and subscribe to read more.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

Larry Greer 20 December 2025

I’m not sure I’ve ever read a more facile handling of the role that technology has played in getting us to the existential threat of an unchecked Anthropocene marked by so little cognizance of the costs of runaway technology that here we are already marching headlong into a Transanthropocene that’s not likely to overmatch humanity any less than all the earlier brave new worlds that revolutionary new technology keeps sweeping us into before we’ve come remotely close to catching up with ourselves enough to acquit ourselves decently in any of the old brave new worlds that have fetched us up to another brave new new one that fetches us up to a brave new newer one.

In her raving about the influence of technological advancement on the human condition, Zion relies on how conveniently inured over these last thousands of years our kind have so blame-worthily become to such downsides of technology’s march as the hundreds and hundreds of millions (and always counting) of dead men, women and children that in the five and a half thousand years since a technological innovation like the wheel was invented have been piled up along our march of so-called human progress due to the never-ending assembly line of new and improved engines of killing one another and due to the still so virulent original sickness of this big technology-enabled and relentlessly new technology-creating breakthrough we keep calling “civilization” no matter how catastrophically hostile it’s always been in its truly awful 12,000-year history to large swaths of a human population derangedly arranged pyramidally thanks in large part to all that technology has to offer those among us with their hearts set on getting to the top of the sick pyramid and staying there at all social costs.

Zion says “Embracing technological progress makes societies soar” and says technology “…opened the space for civilization itself to emerge and flourish” and says technology is the “most profound engine of human advancement” and says technology is “central to human flourishing” and makes any number of other statements begging for some reflection on the state of affairs here in this particularly technological age where soaring global average atmospheric carbon dioxide has reached 420-something ppm and 44% of the global population (3.5 billion people) live in poverty and anomie and other mental health issues are epidemic and inordinately powerful billionaire tech lords talk glowingly about a Dark Enlightenment and inequality does the same harm to human social bonds it’s always done and the world’s most cutting-edge nation technology-wise is aiding and abetting a genocide in the Holy Land on the heels of technologically shocking and awing a lot of men, women and children to death in the cradle of this civilization you can only describe as flourishing if you overlook large swaths of the population.

Arguing that more humanity-overmatching technological development is the way to solve the social problems unchecked technology causes is as hollow, I believe, as offering the bromide that we “must guide technological development ethically and intelligently” or the bromide that all we need is “governance, oversight and ethical design” to save ourselves from all the dangers that runaway technology poses for a civilization that’s never once demonstrated a capacity for governing or overseeing or ethically designing the technologies over and above the ones that actually improve the human condition.

Reply