The divide between belief and emotion is an illusion

Belief is an emotion

The divide between belief and emotion is an illusion 2

We like to think belief and emotion belong in different boxes—one ruled by evidence and truth, the other by feelings and moods. But that divide is an illusion, argues philosopher Miriam Schleifer McCormick. We’d do better to think of beliefs as emotions, because believing involves feeling something to be the case, and the worth of a belief depends not just on the evidence for it but on whether it helps us live well. The ideal believer is not, as the AI industry might have us think, a flawless information-processing system, but a being whose reason breathes with emotion.


Beliefs figure prominently in how we understand each other, are essential for navigating the world, and help define our characters and motivations. But what are beliefs? According to standard philosophical theories of belief, an ideal believer is a flawless information-processing system. Of course, we fail to live up to this ideal because of our human limitations. We get angry, despondent, dazzled, exuberant, grief-stricken, horny, hungry, lazy, sick, tired, wonderstruck. The standard view sees these human traits as infecting our belief-maintenance systems, sometimes to explain our bad beliefs and sometimes to show that what may look like a belief, say that God is a comforting presence, is not a belief at all because it is not even aiming at this ideal.

___

When I am afraid, I feel that there is danger. Similarly, I contend, when I believe something, I feel that the way I am representing the world is accurate.

___

In my book Belief as Emotion (OUP, 2025) I offer an alternative picture of belief. I propose that we view belief as a type of emotion. Most emotion theorists view emotions as essentially blended states, as involving both feelings as well as some kind of cognitive representation. The elements that make up the blend are not separable mental states that are added together. When I am afraid, I feel that there is danger. Similarly, I contend, when I believe something, I feel that the way I am representing the world is accurate. Emotion is such a wide tent, encompassing everything from fear and anger to curiosity and contentment; I propose that “belief” be added to the list. Thinking of beliefs as emotions helps to explain several puzzling phenomena related to belief. Why, for example, do we continue to act on implicit biases even when we are aware of them? Why do many people claim to hold religious beliefs while not acting in accord with religious doctrine? Ideal emotional maintenance is complex; thinking of beliefs as emotions acknowledges and embraces this complexity in our lives as believers.

related-video-image SUGGESTED VIEWING Belief, value and superstition With Rana Mitter, Janne Teller, Paul Bloom, Winston Marshall, Fellipe do Vale

Continue reading

Enjoy unlimited access to the world's leading thinkers.

Start by exploring our subscription options or joining our mailing list today.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest Releases
Join the conversation

Brian Balke 21 October 2025

I find it helpful to recognize three stages in intelligence. The first, practical intelligence, involves learning to do things. In this stage, facts are critical to validation of our skill.

Once we have attained sufficient skill, we begin to consider how we feel during performance. This is the stage of emotional intelligence. An emotion characterizes our physiological response to experience. These responses are too complex to enumerate as facts (my face is hot, my skin is moist, my heart races, etc., etc.), but we need to categorize them so that we can evolve strategies for managing them. None-the-less, the represent interoceptive facts - the subjectivity of our experience that others cannot know.

Emotional intelligence is therefore not concerned with our relationship to the world, but the relationship with our body. This is critical, for if our behavior does not serve our organic well-being, the body will withdraw its support. We become depressed.

In the final stage of intelligence, we grasp that we are social creatures. Sustaining sympathetic emotions requires the participation of others. This is the stage of moral intelligence, which is concerned with defining and sustaining fulfilling relationships.

The fetish for practical intelligence (science and AI) reflects the fragility of life. We can learn to do things that create enormous impact in the lives of others. It is convenient (and now prevalent) to use terrorism to coerce people to cede us power. This is inevitable among those who reduce the measures of practical success to ownership.

Given all this, while I agree broadly with Schleifer McCormick, I think that objective and subjective experience ("facts" and "emotions", respectively) are valid representations of truth. Subjectivity is less precise, however, because we cannot compare the sensations that we characterize as "anger," "passion," or "joy."

Many of the challenges that are described as conflicts of belief in this essay, however, I would consider to be moral conflicts. Moral dialog is concerned with virtues and vices. The former cultivates social cohesion, the latter dissolves it. This is another world of philosophical discourse. As love is the foundation of virtue, religion has a great deal to offer.

Reply