Claims are being made that artificial intelligence will allow us to translate animal language. Following Wittgenstein, Constantine Sandis thinks different.

The growing market for ‘pet communication buttons’ is leading to a rise in the number of extremely impressive videos and blogs from pet owners documenting how their animals – particularly canines – use talking pet buttons. I recently tried a couple of these button sets on my dog, Calypso, and she gave them a bit of a half-hearted chew before losing all interest, so we won’t be starting any TikTok trends just yet. What is more, recent headlines suggest that AI, and in particular large language models, can help us translate the sounds animals make to communicate with each other into human language. Wittgenstein's philosophy can help us understand why such far-fetched claims of animals communicating in a human language, and humans understanding animal language are misleading.

The basic premise of pet communication is simple enough. The cats, dogs, birds, and other non-human animal companions with whom we share our lives clearly have a working understanding of the words or phrases that we use to communicate with them: ‘wait’, ‘eat your food’, ‘where’s your ball?’, ‘walking home’, etc. Although philosophers of various stripes may concoct fancy arguments in defence of the view that non-human animals have no language or concepts, there are no fixed parameters to what counts as a language, and only someone in the grip of a philosophical theory would be tempted to deny that our fellow creatures have any kind of grasp (however limited) of certain concepts.